Recommended arm hardware (mostly for compilation)?

Dan Kotowski dan.kotowski at a9development.com
Thu May 14 15:31:11 UTC 2020


I have a SolidRun HoneyComb workstation board based on the LX2K and can confirm it's quite powerful, however I have only been able to get Linux-based systems running - I have not been able to get FreeBSD working, but am working on it. SolidRun provides all the sources necessary to do so, it's just a matter of interpreting all the documentation.

I'll be posting about that in another thread shortly.

Dan Kotowski

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:33 PM, Klaus Küchemann via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm at freebsd.org> wrote:

>
>
> > Am 14.05.2020 um 16:04 schrieb myfreeweb greg at unrelenting.technology:
> > On May 14, 2020 1:34:52 PM UTC, Philipp Klaus Krause pkk at spth.de wrote:
> >
> > > Can you recommend some hardware?
> >
> > AWS EC2 m6g instances :)
> >
> > > RockPro64 - hardware seems okay, though only 4 GB of RAM. I've read on
> > > this list thaat the big/little cores aren't handled well by FreeBSD.
> >
> > There's no smart scheduler setting that would keep the big cores occupied as much as possible for max performance, yes.
> > But if you don't need more parallelism than 2 cores, you can just cpuset your workload to the big cores.
> >
> > > MACCHIATObin - a bit on the expensive side, but still okay and has a RAM
> > > slot.
> >
> > It's great, it's the cheapest arm64 "Actual PC" you can get.
> >
> > freebsd-arm at freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe at freebsd.org>
> If someone’s looking for horsepower between those options, consider the LX2K from SolidRun,
> while current support for FreeBSD is unknown to me .
>
> freebsd-arm at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"




More information about the freebsd-arm mailing list