rk_tsadc breaks (my) Rock64
Michal Meloun
meloun.michal at gmail.com
Mon Dec 2 13:53:09 UTC 2019
On 02.12.2019 14:04, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 22:13:22 +1100
> Peter Jeremy <peter at rulingia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2019-Dec-01 22:07:16 +1100, Peter Jeremy <peter at rulingia.com> wrote:
>>> r355173 added code to read the Rockchip temperature sensors. Unfortunately,
>>> this breaks on my Rock64. I've tried to understand what's going wrong but
>>> haven't managed to make much headway. It looks like there some configuration
>>> missing from syscon that tsadc needs but I'm not sure what (and I don't really
>>> understand what syscon is doing). I'd appreciate any insights.
>>
>> I've added a pile of printf's and done some more digging and have made some
>> progress.
>>
>> Firstly, I've found that the syscon at ff100000 FDT entry attaches as two
>> distinct devices:
>> rk_grf0: <RockChip General Register Files> mem 0xff100000-0xff100fff on ofwbus0
>> (via compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-grf")
>> simple_mfd0: <Simple MFD (Multi-Functions Device)> mem 0xff450000-0xff45ffff on ofwbus0
>> (via compatible = "simple-mfd")
>
> ??? those aren't the same devices.
>
>> Based on the traceback going via simple_mfd_syscon_write_4(), I had assumed
>> that tsadc_attach() was using the latter device but when I added code to
>> print structure addresses, I discovered it was the former.
>>
>> This makes the problem clearer: rk_grf0 requests and is allocated 4KiB
>> memory ("reg = <0x0 0xff100000 0x0 0x1000>;" in the FDT and
>> "mem 0xff100000-0xff100fff" in the device attach message above) but the
>> tsadc_init() code is doing:
>> SYSCON_WRITE_4(sc->grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L,
>> GRF_TSADC_VCM_EN_L);
>> with
>> #define GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L 0x0e648
>> and that offset is well outside the 4KiB allocated to the device.
>> (On the positive side, a panic makes the problem a lot clearer than
>> writing to a random device location would have been).
>>
>> Ganbold's followup shows that the RK3399 allocates 64KiB to the syscon
>> device so the equivalent write is valid on a RK3399.
>>
>> I suspect the problem is that the following defines are only valid for
>> the RK3399 since I can't find any matches to either the names or offsets
>> in the following:
>> #define GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT 0x0e644
>> #define GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L 0x0e648
>> #define GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H 0x0e64c
>>
>> Unfortunately, that also means I currently have no idea what the RK3328
>> equivalents to those offsets are.
>>
>> --
>> Peter Jeremy
>
> root at rock64:~ # uname -a
> FreeBSD rock64.home.blih.net 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #13 r355188:355190M: Thu Nov 28 21:43:00 CET 2019 manu at skull.home.blih.net:/usr/home/manu/Work/freebsd/obj/usr/home/manu/Work/freebsd/freebsd-svn/base/head/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64
> root at rock64:~ # sysctl hw.temperature
> hw.temperature.CPU: 50.7C
>
> Everything is working for me after I've added the clocks, so I don't
> know what's happening for you. But after looking again at the docs it
> seems that rk3328 is a mix between v2 and v3 so the GRF write are wrong.
> I'll have a look today or tomorow and fix this.
>
Peter,
can you please try following trivial patch?
Michal
-------------- next part --------------
diff --git a/sys/arm64/rockchip/rk_tsadc.c b/sys/arm64/rockchip/rk_tsadc.c
index 744dc1b8afb..994d4e176e8 100644
--- a/sys/arm64/rockchip/rk_tsadc.c
+++ b/sys/arm64/rockchip/rk_tsadc.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static struct tsensor rk3328_tsensors[] = {
};
static struct tsadc_conf rk3328_tsadc_conf = {
- .type = RK_TSADC_V3,
+ .type = RK_TSADC_V2,
.shutdown_temp = 95000,
.shutdown_mode = 0, /* CRU */
.shutdown_pol = 0, /* Low */
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list