portsnap failing on armv6

[Allan Jude]

On 2017-03-15 08:25, Kyle Evans wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I definitely misread that. AllanJude@ had done a fix for lam
> back in r314095-ish, but that might not have covered the no-capsicum case.
> 
> 
> On Mar 15, 2017 5:01 AM, "Jia-Shiun Li" <jiashiun at gmail.com
> <mailto:jiashiun at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Kyle,
> 
>     I simply rebuilt and replaced diff and the result is the same.
>     According to portsnap source and its output, it suggests lam
>     is to blame, not diff as r315197 implied. Or do I need to
>     build something else?
> 
>     -Jia-Shiun.
> 
> 
>     On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jiashiun at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Thank you. And Baptiste.
> 
>         I was lucky enough to get it just before the commit. ;)
> 
>         Will try later.
> 
> 
>         Jia-Shiun.
> 
> 
>         On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Kyle Evans <kevans91 at ksu.edu
>         <mailto:kevans91 at ksu.edu>> wrote:
> 
>             On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Jia-Shiun Li
>             <jiashiun at gmail.com <mailto:jiashiun at gmail.com>> wrote:
>             > [snip]
>             > Verifying snapshot integrity... lam: unable to limit rights on: -: Function
>             > not implemented
> 
>             Hi,
> 
>             This should be fixed by bapt@ in r315197 =)
> 
>             Thanks,
> 
>             Kyle Evans
> 
> 
> 
> 

Portsnap will not work on armv6, as there are no freebsd-update builds
for that architecture. However, lam(1) still does not work without
capsicum. I am looking into it.

-- 
Allan Jude

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/attachments/20170315/3bf49fb1/attachment.sig>