Atmel at91sam9261-ek support.

Sylvestre Gallon ccna.syl at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 12:52:23 PDT 2009


On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:42 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> In message: <00675D70-A3F9-412F-BDB9-F9CF8C91D75A at freebsd.org>
>            Arnar Mar Sig <antab at freebsd.org> writes:
>
> All of this hand wringing is because we've boguslly collapsed the core
> support, the SoC support and the board support into one file.  We have
> to move away from that model and properly layer things to move
> forward.  The means by which we load this or that thing isn't going to
> matter so much until we adopt this better structure.
>
> Warner
>

Do you think that I can try to update the diff to separate the
SoC code, the board code and the at91 generic code and
re-submit it before the end of the week?

Also I'm currently looking for google summer of code possible
proposals and have access to a big range of different Atmel boards.
Do you think that the improvement of the at91 architecture, and the
adding of support for another SoC could be a potential subject ? And
if  so, is someone ready to be my mentor for this project ?

Cheers
-- 
Sylvestre Gallon (http://devsyl.blogspot.com)
Fifth Grade Student @ Epitech & Researcher @ LSE
R&D @ Rathaxes (http://www.rathaxes.org)


More information about the freebsd-arm mailing list