Atmel at91sam9261-ek support.
Sylvestre Gallon
ccna.syl at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 12:52:23 PDT 2009
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:42 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> In message: <00675D70-A3F9-412F-BDB9-F9CF8C91D75A at freebsd.org>
> Arnar Mar Sig <antab at freebsd.org> writes:
>
> All of this hand wringing is because we've boguslly collapsed the core
> support, the SoC support and the board support into one file. We have
> to move away from that model and properly layer things to move
> forward. The means by which we load this or that thing isn't going to
> matter so much until we adopt this better structure.
>
> Warner
>
Do you think that I can try to update the diff to separate the
SoC code, the board code and the at91 generic code and
re-submit it before the end of the week?
Also I'm currently looking for google summer of code possible
proposals and have access to a big range of different Atmel boards.
Do you think that the improvement of the at91 architecture, and the
adding of support for another SoC could be a potential subject ? And
if so, is someone ready to be my mentor for this project ?
Cheers
--
Sylvestre Gallon (http://devsyl.blogspot.com)
Fifth Grade Student @ Epitech & Researcher @ LSE
R&D @ Rathaxes (http://www.rathaxes.org)
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list