if_ate handles the bytes of the MAC address in a "wrong" order

[Björn König]

Bernd wrote:

> They do all agree - it is the same as the SAM7X.

Right, my mistake.

> However - I prefer the explizit byte code as we do now, instead of
> using bcopy.

I agree. It is safer and looks more familar.

Björn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: emac_init.c.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/attachments/20070609/d33977ea/emac_init.c.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: if_ate.c.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1557 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/attachments/20070609/d33977ea/if_ate.c.bin