ks8695_reg.h
mlfbsd
mlfbsd at ci0.org
Sat Sep 23 12:25:14 PDT 2006
Hi Gardner,
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 03:10:07PM -0400, Gardner Bell wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm presently working on the KS8695 registers header file and am
> curious what I should and should not include in this file. At the
> moment I have included almost every register that the data sheets
> mention. Is this a good idea, or should I make separate header files
> for things like the UART and memory controller registers? I've
> included a copy of what I have done so far. Any help and or
> recommendations you can offer, particularly on my naming conventions is
> most welcome.
>
Great to hear !
I think defining all the registers is a good thing, as you can't always guess
which one you would use.
If when you'll define each individual bits it becomes to big, you may want to
do a seperate file for the UART, but I think the others can stay here.
Oh and I see nothing wrong with your naming convention :)
Cheers,
Olivier
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list