libifconfig non-private in 13?

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:02:00PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Libifconfig was marked as private (and experimental) back in 2016.
> It’s since made some strides and has grown a few users. Ifconfig now depends
> on it as well.
> 
> While it’s far from finished it’d be more useful for some users if it were
> public. That would at least imply some level of API/ABI stability, which is
> why I’m bringing it up here before pulling the trigger.
> 
> Does anyone see any reasons to not do this?
> 

I would go the otherway around, any reason to make it public yet? if yes they go
ahead, if no keep it private ;)

Best regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20201226/9a468586/attachment.sig>