Importing mksh in base
Simon J. Gerraty
sjg at juniper.net
Sat Jan 26 23:37:26 UTC 2019
Adam <amvandemore at gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not wish to have a bash like root shell since imo its interactive mode
I don't know why eveyone is fixating on bash. ksh is *not* bash.
A /bin/sh compatible shell with good user interaction, is great.
You can cut/paste lines from shell scripts to test interactively
rather than have to first spawn /bin/sh
> isn't that great. I don't think conformity is a great argument for change
> in this regard. I don't see any other advantage to this change. I could
> be wrong but I also think it might be incorrect to say bash is the default
> root shell on other BSD's.
I don't think anyone said that. ksh is one of the options for root
shell on netbsd - has been for at least a decade or so.
I've always used ksh as root shell.
> If there is some change to the root shell, I'd rather see it to be zsh
> which does have a good interactive mode.
FWIW I never liked zsh - seemed a bit like bash - trying to be a hybrid of
every shell that ever was.
Believe it or not, some people do not like csh at all, and will use
anything else.
--sjg
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list