arm64 as Tier 1 for FreeBSD 13
Paul Mather
paul at gromit.dlib.vt.edu
Wed Dec 4 14:49:06 UTC 2019
On Dec 4, 2019, at 4:24 AM, Robert Clausecker <fuz at fuz.su> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 07:29:57AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <CAPyFy2BXWPVOJo+GOf83sZFrPHE80-QvdHeWrhi+Tdj0KDnThg at mail.gmail.com>, Ed Maste writes:
>>> We don't do this today, but have the ability to do so for arm64 server
>>> platforms. (Due to its design, freebsd-update does not work
>>> particularly well on devices with slow root filesystems such as SD
>>> cards.)
>>
>> I don't think storage-technology should be used as a discriminant here.
>>
>> First because it is quite trivial to plug in a quality USB SSD (WD
>> passport for instance) and use that as root filesystem.
>>
>> Second, just because freebsd-update takes a day to run, doesn't mean
>> that people would not want it.
>
> Indeed. For example, on a Raspberry Pi 3B, it takes multiple days to
> build world as the build must be done single threaded due to a lack of
> RAM (building LLVM is the worst offender here). Getting it down to one
> day is already a huge quality of life improvement.
I'm running FreeBSD/arm64 12-STABLE on a Raspberry Pi 3 using a root-on-ZFS setup. I've been using packaged base for quite some time, cross-building on FreeBSD/amd64. Every time I upgrade FreeBSD via "pkg upgrade" it seems to me that it does not take an inordinately long time. It takes longer than packaged base on a regular FreeBSD/amd64 server with spinning disk, but not an excessive amount of time. It's certainly on the order of minutes, not hours.
Cheers,
Paul.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list