The future of fortune(6)

[Hans Petter Selasky]

On 11/22/17 22:16, A. Wilcox wrote:
> On 22/11/17 14:44, Warner Losh wrote:
>>      If there is no political agenda, then moving the entire thing to a port
>>      would have been the right thing to do – including the datfiles.
>>
>>
>> No. That would also give the project's endorsement to it. Gone is 'no
>> opinion at all' we have.
> 
> 
> And *since* you have decided that "having a port" implies endorsement of
> a project, before I archive this thread, here are a few more ports that
> you should probably poke portmaster about:
> 
Hi,

The FreeBSD project already changed its logo to be more friendly and I 
think it is sad when people misunderstand the FreeBSD's Beastie trying 
to attribute myself as a FreeBSD developer certain attributes.

Humor and irony is individual like Warner pointed out and some people 
will never understand it and take it literally instead.

By deleting the non-FreeBSD fortunes are we certain we solve a problem 
and don't simply move it somewhere else?

About offensive port names, how about "/usr/ports/print/removethedots" :-)

--HPS