UMA_ZONE_CACHESPREAD and uma_zsecond_add

[Adrian Chadd]

Is there any reason to nuke it right now? Is it preventing other work
from progressing?



-adrian

On 12 March 2017 at 11:55, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin at cs.duke.edu> wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 10:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>
>> First, the history of UMA_ZONE_CACHESPREAD and uma_zsecond_add():
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2008-December/008800.html
>>
>> Now, more than 8 years after those features were introduced, we still
>> don't have
>> a single in-tree consumer for them.
>> Does anyone use those features out of tree?
>> Does anyone still have plans to make use of them?
>> Will anyone get sad if those features get garbage collected?
>
>
> This is something that I keep getting suggestions to try at Netflix
> on our 100G boxes.  From the description, it really seems like
> it might help us to have a few data types allocated like this.
>
> Can you give me, say, one month to look into this before axing
> it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Drew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"