[RFC] Removin the old make
Chris H
bsd-lists at bsdforge.com
Fri Feb 13 01:01:50 UTC 2015
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:47:27 -0700 Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote
> On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for
> > > tha= > t I
> > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the
> > > old = .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > make
> > > > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> > > >
> > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10.
> > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Bapt
> > >
> > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to
> > > remove old make without notice ?
> > >
> > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources and
> > that is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bapt
>
> fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it? That's what I vaguely remember
> as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake
> source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but
> available as a port.
If that's the case. It all hardly seems worth an announcement.
Nothing's lost, and everyone wins. :)
--Chris
>
> -- Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list