removing bdes..
Slawa Olhovchenkov
slw at zxy.spb.ru
Tue Feb 10 22:37:39 UTC 2015
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:18:34PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/10/15 12:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > bdes have exploit? or have bad code (mktmp. fgets)? openssl (with
> > strong encryption algorithms) full of known expoit.
>
> bdes(1) is known broken for certain (rare) encryption modes:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=149412
Good points, thanks.
> And nobody cared.
I am need to understand FreeBSD team policy.
Before this none will be removed from base.
Removed because broken and nobody cares -- I am fully appreciate.
Removed because implement weak algorithm -- I am dislike this: next
step remove any unencryped and broken compatibility and
interoperability (like LibreSSL break LANMAN hash support in
OpenLDAP).
> Its functionality can be implemented using openssl's command line
[not bdes advocate] compatibility tested?
(And yes, I am not use bdes, I am only ack for protocol).
> utility, and keep in mind that's an obsolete standard for many years
> anyways.
[not bdes advocate] somebody may have very old archive and need too
access.
> We don't want to keep multiple implementations of same cryptographic
> functionality anyways, it's just bad regardless if they are obsolete
> or not, and bdes(1) have shown exactly why it's bad.
Yes, I see.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list