removing bdes..

[Xin Li]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/09/15 10:15, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> So, I happen to stuble across bdes recently and think we should
> remove it..
> 
> I'm fine w/ making it a port so that people who need it can use
> it...
> 
> Especially considering: The DES cipher should no longer be
> considered secure.  Please consider using a more modern
> alternative.
> 
> Though sadly, that comment was added almost 15 years after DES was 
> brute forced by DEEPCrack.

I agree, this should be made a port and removed from base.

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net>    https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!           Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1.1 (FreeBSD)
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=fu0M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----