script(2) [was: [CFT/review] new sendfile(2)]

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <5404D1B8.9010006 at mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:

>> In message <5403B13C.60008 at freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>>
>>> Lua at the syscall level makes sense. :)
>> I doubt it.
>>
>> We're looking at high performance stuff and we don't want a silly
>> parser and string processing involved.
>>
>Would it really matter?  Lua is bytecode, [...]

I though you wanted the interpreter in the kernel.

If it's only the executor, then ... maybe... 

We'd need to do a serious audit of the lua bytecode first...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.