/usr/lib/private

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:29AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> Is there any reason not to make it /private/usr/lib (or
> /private/usr/lib/platform)? I could see us wanting a /private/usr/include
> in the future for e.g. LLVM/Clang headers that things in base (e.g.
> lldb) might use but whose stability we don't want to be responsible for.
> 
The libraries (and headers) are not needed in the single-user mode, and
we are still trying to maintain the / and /usr split.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20130905/413bcc01/attachment.sig>