How about finally replacing GNATS?

[Garrett Cooper]

On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:

> On 30 October 2012 13:39, Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Erik Cederstrand <erik at cederstrand.dk> wrote:
>> [..]
>>> I'm not suggesting send-pr should go. I even provided a script to keep using it with Bugzilla. I'm just curious what's so great about it in 2012. Offline is a good argument, and HTTP sucks at offline.
>> 
>> But I am.
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> There are good reasons to keep send-pr and good reasons to get rid of
> it.   We are not yet at the stage where it even makes sense to discuss
> it.

+1 about it being too soon to make official policy decisions.

I think creating a catch-all to convert the PR request to a bugzilla bug as others have suggested would be an awesome idea, so that way the only thing that changes is the submission link.

If nothing more, send-pr can continue to function for ushering bugs into bugzilla.
-Garrett