unix domain sockets on nullfs(5)

[Mikolaj Golub]

On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:08:33 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote:

 KB> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 04:36:50PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
 >> Hi,
 >> 
 >> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:16:08 +0000 Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
 >> 
 >>  RNMW> On 25 Feb 2012, at 17:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
 >> 
 >>  >>> I am thinking now about 'MFC after'. Thanks to jhb's spare vops it looks like
 >>  >>> it is possible to merge it in stable/9 without breaking the KBI, but then I
 >>  >>> will consume 3 of 5 available spare vops. So is it worth doing?
 >>  >> I do not think that we shall be so restrained on the use of spare VOPs.
 >> 
 >>  RNMW> I think the only real question here is whether John had specific things
 >>  RNMW> in mind when he added the spares, or whether they are open for general
 >>  RNMW> use. Assuming they are open for general use, this use seems a quite
 >>  RNMW> beneficial one :-).
 >> 
 >> I am going to MFC VOP_UNP_* operations (r232317) and this is just to ask the
 >> last time if someone sees problems with this or would like to reserve them for
 >> other things.
 >> 
 >> Also could you please look at the merge diff I am going to commit if it looks
 >> ok?

 KB> Looks fine.

Thanks, merged.

-- 
Mikolaj Golub