unix domain sockets on nullfs(5)

[Mikolaj Golub]

Hi,

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:16:08 +0000 Robert N. M. Watson wrote:

 RNMW> On 25 Feb 2012, at 17:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote:

 >>> I am thinking now about 'MFC after'. Thanks to jhb's spare vops it looks like
 >>> it is possible to merge it in stable/9 without breaking the KBI, but then I
 >>> will consume 3 of 5 available spare vops. So is it worth doing?
 >> I do not think that we shall be so restrained on the use of spare VOPs.

 RNMW> I think the only real question here is whether John had specific things
 RNMW> in mind when he added the spares, or whether they are open for general
 RNMW> use. Assuming they are open for general use, this use seems a quite
 RNMW> beneficial one :-).

I am going to MFC VOP_UNP_* operations (r232317) and this is just to ask the
last time if someone sees problems with this or would like to reserve them for
other things.

Also could you please look at the merge diff I am going to commit if it looks
ok?

-- 
Mikolaj Golub

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: r232317.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5548 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20120422/80b95b2e/r232317.bin