[PATCH] fadvise(2) system call

Doug Barton dougb at FreeBSD.org
Mon Oct 31 20:49:08 UTC 2011


On 10/31/2011 12:03, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> * John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org>, 20111031 15:24:
>> Existing applications use the name and I find it ugly.  (I also wish we
>> had a plain fallocate() instead of just posix_fallocate().)  However, if
>> other folks prefer not having the wrapper I could update it to use the
>> posix_* name.
> 
> I agree with Jilles. It's easier to introduce namespace pollution than
> it is to get rid of it afterwards. If the function is called
> posix_fadvise(), people should just use that.
> 
> People are constantly complaining about `Linuxisms' when they want to
> port software to FreeBSD. The word `BSDism' should remain an euphemism.
> ;-)

+1 to both points.  :)



-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/



More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list