tmux(1) in base
Alfred Perlstein
alfred at freebsd.org
Mon Sep 21 16:19:47 UTC 2009
* Joel Dahl <joel at FreeBSD.org> [090921 09:17] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein skrev:
> >* Garrett Wollman <wollman at hergotha.csail.mit.edu> [090921 06:10] wrote:
> >>In article <20090921130346.GY21946 at elvis.mu.org> you write:
> >>
> >>>I think he already explained that it's supposedly much better than
> >>>window(1) with a kinder license than screen(1).
> >>>
> >>>We really ought to ship with a screen(1)-like program.
> >>sudo pkg_add -r screen
> >>
> >>Problem solved.
> >
> >WORKS GREAT ESP WHEN NETWORK IS DOWN AND SOMEONE NEEDS MY HELP.
> >
> >WORKS AWESOME ON REALLY OLD MACHINES WHERE PACKAGES NO LONGER
> >EXIST.
> >
> >Note: Apple, which cares more about a usable userland unix than
> >we do at this time has screen installed in base as well.
>
> OpenBSD has tmux in base...and I've seen discussions on the NetBSD lists
> about importing tmux (as a window(1) replacement) into NetBSD base as
> well... :-)
I dunno Joel, we wouldn't want to get crazy and ship a system that
was usable out of the box, I'd like to go back to a Solaris
circa 1999 like system, y'know, kernel+/bin/sh, don't need much
more than that y'know...
--
- Alfred Perlstein
.- AMA, VMOA #5191, 03 vmax, 92 gs500, 85 ch250
.- FreeBSD committer
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list