Do we still need ATA disk CHS addressing?
Takahashi Yoshihiro
nyan at jp.FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 11 10:56:12 UTC 2009
In article <20090810.162424.846948847.imp at bsdimp.com>
"M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> There's also some oddities at the lowest levels for pc98 controllers,
> but I don't think this change would affect that. However, like I
> said, ask the pc98 guys for sure.
>
> I've cc'd nyan@, since he can answer the question: "What breaks in
> pc98 if we lose support for CHS-based disk I/O?"
The following document in Japanese says: "PC-98 usually use CHS
addressing. PC-98 does not use LBA addressing."
http://www.webtech.co.jp/company/doc/undocumented_mem/io_ide.txt
But I could use 400MB HDD with LBA addressing on my pc98, so it seems
that my pc98 supports LBA addressing at least. I don't know older
pc98 supports it or not.
---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan at jp.FreeBSD.org>
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list