Updated rusage patch

[Attilio Rao]

2007/6/7, Jeff Roberson <jroberson at chesapeake.net>:
> The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/rusage3.diff fixes points 1
> and 2 as well as the p_runtime iniitialization problem.  This moves the
> collection of child rusage back into exit1() and changes the exiting
> threads to accumulate their rusage into p_ru under protection of the
> process spinlock.  This also removes the gross lock/unlock of proc slock
> (formerly sched_lock) from wait and implements something more sensible.

I have a question:
it is fair to assume that extra per-proc spinlock
acquisitions/removals on the PRS_ZOMBIE state are orthogonal to this
problem? They should belong to another 'fix', shouldn't?

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein