Porting OpenBSD's sysctl hw.sensors framework to FreeBSD

John-Mark Gurney gurney_j at resnet.uoregon.edu
Wed Jul 11 19:07:52 UTC 2007


Constantine A. Murenin wrote this message on Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 20:13 -0400:
> If you want to have no such framework that could potentially diagnose or 
> predict system failure, it's your choice, and I'm not going to argue 
> against it. However, there are many people who desire to have this 
> feature in an operating system, and these people include FreeBSD users 
> and developers.

No one is saying that we don't want a framekwork to provide this
information...  We want to put the framework in the proper place that
will be the most maintainable, testable and extensible location possible:
userland...  A single bug in the kernel framework and associated drivers
could take the entire system down...  The worse a userland app can do
is core dump...

Having recently written an HDTV driver...  It was a god-send to have
the tuner logic and related items in userland, and only use the kernel
part as a bit mover..  It made testing very quick, and will enable
people to develope additional tuners w/o having to go through crashing
their machine as they load/unload drivers that contain bugs..

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list