Porting OpenBSD's sysctl hw.sensors framework to FreeBSD
John-Mark Gurney
gurney_j at resnet.uoregon.edu
Wed Jul 11 19:07:52 UTC 2007
Constantine A. Murenin wrote this message on Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 20:13 -0400:
> If you want to have no such framework that could potentially diagnose or
> predict system failure, it's your choice, and I'm not going to argue
> against it. However, there are many people who desire to have this
> feature in an operating system, and these people include FreeBSD users
> and developers.
No one is saying that we don't want a framekwork to provide this
information... We want to put the framework in the proper place that
will be the most maintainable, testable and extensible location possible:
userland... A single bug in the kernel framework and associated drivers
could take the entire system down... The worse a userland app can do
is core dump...
Having recently written an HDTV driver... It was a god-send to have
the tuner logic and related items in userland, and only use the kernel
part as a bit mover.. It made testing very quick, and will enable
people to develope additional tuners w/o having to go through crashing
their machine as they load/unload drivers that contain bugs..
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list