kernel features MIB
Alfred Perlstein
alfred at freebsd.org
Thu Dec 27 21:31:02 PST 2007
Sounds pretty rad.
* John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org> [071227 15:20] wrote:
> One of the things we have at work is a kern.features sysctl MIB that contains
> nodes to indicate if a named feature is present. For example, on i386 we
> have kern.features.pae and we auto enable -DPAE for kernel modules if the
> currently running kernel is using PAE using that sysctl.
>
> One of the patches I want to commit soon is support for handling
> shm_open/shm_unlink directly in the kernel via swap-backed VM objects (the
> long-heralded memfd stuff). I would like to have the sysctl MIB so that
> libc's for older releases (e.g. libc.so.6) could use the syscalls if they are
> available so that shm segments are shared between compat apps (e.g. 4.x or
> 6.x) and up-to-date apps.
>
> At work we don't have a pretty API for this at all, but I'm thinking for
> FreeBSD we can do this:
>
> FEATURE(foo, "description of foo")
>
> which is a macro to create the 'kern.features.foo' node and set it to 1. Then
> we could have a routine in libc:
>
> int feature_present(const char *name);
>
> That returns a boolean to indicate if a given feature is present or not by
> invoking sysctlbyname(3), etc.
>
> Any objections to the idea?
>
> --
> John Baldwin
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
--
- Alfred Perlstein
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list