[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

[Colin Percival]

Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-02-13 00:23, "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>> 	struct foo foo;
>> 	uint32_t value[sizeof(foo) / sizeof(uint32_t)];
>>
>> 	memcpy(value, &foo);
>> 	// write out value one 32-bit word at a time
>>
>> Is that right?  Or at least 'proper' here means defined.
> 
> AFAIK, yes.

I agree that the behaviour of the above code is defined, but
I'd be much happier if value[] was defined to be an array of
length ((sizeof(foo) - 1) / sizeof(uint32_t) + 1), just in
case sizeof(foo) happens to not be a multiple of 4.  :-)

Colin Percival