Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in
6-current?
Doug Barton
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Mon Mar 21 18:28:40 PST 2005
John Baldwin wrote:
> I agree in that I think BIND is good to have in the tree. I think it should
> just default to install everything. Folks who don't want certain things can
> always prune them out later. Having the server installed can be useful for
> being able to run a local caching nameserver at conferences when the hotel
> DNS is horrible (Boston ATC last year) even if you don't run it all the
> time. :) Also, the release process will be a lot simpler if it just installs
> everything by default.
As far as I can see, this comment from John (and the similar one from
Robert) represent the consensus viewpoint. I will therefore drop this as an
action item unless someone makes a very convincing case to change the
current defaults.
Thanks to everyone who offered their opinions and support on this topic.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list