Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current?

Doug Barton dougb at FreeBSD.org
Mon Mar 21 18:28:40 PST 2005


John Baldwin wrote:

> I agree in that I think BIND is good to have in the tree.  I think it should 
> just default to install everything.  Folks who don't want certain things can 
> always prune them out later.  Having the server installed can be useful for 
> being able to run a local caching nameserver at conferences when the hotel 
> DNS is horrible (Boston ATC last year) even if you don't run it all the 
> time. :)  Also, the release process will be a lot simpler if it just installs 
> everything by default.

As far as I can see, this comment from John (and the similar one from 
Robert) represent the consensus viewpoint. I will therefore drop this as an 
action item unless someone makes a very convincing case to change the 
current defaults.

Thanks to everyone who offered their opinions and support on this topic.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list