/usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Sun Aug 7 05:32:15 GMT 2005
On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:22:48 -0500, Colin Percival <cperciva at freebsd.org>
wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> Will portsnap improvement on to not delete any unoffical ports? I have
>> about 15 unoffical ports here in local machine and they are living in
>> /usr/ports for other tools' sake like portupgrade/pkgdb. I have never
>> use it, but I read in the bottom of
>> http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ .
>
> Portsnap will not remove any ports which it doesn't know about. Portsnap
> will only remove local modifications when they are in a port or
> infrastructure
> file (e.g., Mk/*) which portsnap is updating to a newer version.
Good, thanks!
Cheers,
Mezz
> Colin Percival
--
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list