/sys/conf is getting unwieldy to handle...
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Oct 4 04:06:41 PDT 2004
In message <200410041241.04608.max at love2party.net>, Max Laier writes:
>Yes, this would create something I liked to call "meta-options" in former=20
>discussions on this topic.
>
>Yet, there is a bit more to it. It would (imo) also involve some thinking=20
>about the way we build modules (there is a TODO item "revised kld build=20
>infrastructure" that seems to cover that part) and maybe also a bit of=20
>reorganization/coalescence of the opt_*.h include mechanism ...
>
>I have thought about this a bit already, so I'd like to help (if my babblin=
>g=20
>makes sense to you ;)
Well, I didn't really plan to get involved in this apart from using it,
this was merely an attempt to encourage people with more spare time
than me to pick up the ball.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list