RFC: NO_FOO knobs in make.conf

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Sep 9 08:30:43 PDT 2003


On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:42:12AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> > In message: <20030905140628.H90946 at 12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz>
> >             Doug Barton <DougB at freebsd.org> writes:
> > : Once we get general consensus (not universal agreement :) on this, I'll
> > : take responsibility for marshaling the aforementioned volunteer
> > : resources.
> > 
> > I'd just do it.  we've already talked this to death.  Lots of people
> > want it, some don't.  Every time we talk about it, that's the
> > outcome.  Let's just do it and get on with our lives.
> 
> Or change all the NO*, NO_* to WANT_* and default them to yes.

That would be inconsistent with the ports tree.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20030909/956924aa/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list