RFC: NO_FOO knobs in make.conf
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Sep 9 08:30:43 PDT 2003
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:42:12AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > In message: <20030905140628.H90946 at 12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz>
> > Doug Barton <DougB at freebsd.org> writes:
> > : Once we get general consensus (not universal agreement :) on this, I'll
> > : take responsibility for marshaling the aforementioned volunteer
> > : resources.
> >
> > I'd just do it. we've already talked this to death. Lots of people
> > want it, some don't. Every time we talk about it, that's the
> > outcome. Let's just do it and get on with our lives.
>
> Or change all the NO*, NO_* to WANT_* and default them to yes.
That would be inconsistent with the ports tree.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20030909/956924aa/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list