#include <sys/lock.h> and <sys/mutex.h>

[Mark Murray]

John Baldwin writes:
> >>Do you need the whole sys/lock.h and sys/mutex.h? Can you get by with
> >>#including sys/_lock.h and/or sys/_mutex.h in sys/bio.h? And possibly
> >>following up by adding the non-underscore variants in the hopefully
> >>few places where they are actually needed.
> > 
> > I can probably get away with the _* versions, but I'd prefer to know
> > what our plans for this sort of situation actually is...
> 
> The _lock.h and _mutex.h were the plan and are suitable for nesting
> in other headers such as sys/bio.h when needed.  sys/lock.h and sys/mutex.h
> should only be included when you need the actual API's rather than just
> the structure definitions.  As another argument, I wouldn't mind having
> sys/mutex.h and sys/sx.h include sys/lock.h but I'm not sure bde@ would
> like that.

Aren't we trying to remove sys/lock.h? If so, cant we move its contents
elsewhere?

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH