apache 2.2 ports

[olli hauer]

On 2014-09-08 15:51, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> 
> 
> +--On 8 septembre 2014 13:41:54 +0000 Mark Felder <feld at freebsd.org> wrote:
> | September 6 2014 10:24 AM, "Adam Weinberger" <adamw at adamw.org> wrote: 
> |> apache team -
> |> 
> |> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on
> |> apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as
> |> of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages.
> |> 
> |> I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to
> |> this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that the right
> |> way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to make
> |> USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2?
> |> 
> | 
> | FYI I had to solve this problem today with the following two make.conf
> | options:
> | 
> | DEFAULT_VERSIONS= apache=2.2  
> | 
> | (note it's 2.2, not 22 -- bsd.default-versions.mk shows a period should
> | be used)
> | 
> | APACHE_PORT= www/apache22
> | 
> | 
> | Previously I only had the DEFAULT_VERSIONS entry and it worked fine.
> | Suddenly I needed to add APACHE_PORT as well. This is with an up to date
> | ports tree -- my packages build automatically every 8 hours.
> 
> Yes, bapt sent a patch to fix that
> <https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/apache-version.diff>


Based on the patch from bapt, I finished a new one (some cases where missing)
https://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/bsd.apache.mk_20140909.diff

Perhaps someone wants to test and/or review before I commit this fix tomorrow.


-- 
Regards,
olli