apache 2.2 ports

[Mathieu Arnold]

+--On 8 septembre 2014 13:41:54 +0000 Mark Felder <feld at freebsd.org> wrote:
| September 6 2014 10:24 AM, "Adam Weinberger" <adamw at adamw.org> wrote: 
|> apache team -
|> 
|> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on
|> apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as
|> of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages.
|> 
|> I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to
|> this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that the right
|> way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to make
|> USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2?
|> 
| 
| FYI I had to solve this problem today with the following two make.conf
| options:
| 
| DEFAULT_VERSIONS= apache=2.2  
| 
| (note it's 2.2, not 22 -- bsd.default-versions.mk shows a period should
| be used)
| 
| APACHE_PORT= www/apache22
| 
| 
| Previously I only had the DEFAULT_VERSIONS entry and it worked fine.
| Suddenly I needed to add APACHE_PORT as well. This is with an up to date
| ports tree -- my packages build automatically every 8 hours.

Yes, bapt sent a patch to fix that
<https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/apache-version.diff>

-- 
Mathieu Arnold