amd64/173235: Have received two crashes within 1 day after installing new packages: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode

[Tommy Sonne Alstrøm]

The following reply was made to PR amd64/173235; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommy_Sonne_Alstr=F8m?= <tommy at anakin.ws>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: amd64/173235: Have received two crashes within 1 day after installing
 new packages: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:44:01 +0100

 I'm very sorry, I just realized that I copied the 1st readout twice. The 
 2nd readout was like this
 
 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
 cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
 fault virtual address   = 0x6
 fault code              = supervisor read data, page not present
 instruction pointer     = 0x20:0xffffffff809da0cc
 stack pointer           = 0x28:0xffffff8451f549b0
 frame pointer           = 0x28:0xffffff8451f54a40
 code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
                          = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
 processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
 current process         = 1068 (named)
 trap number             = 12
 panic: page fault
 cpuid = 0
 KDB: stack backtrace:
 #0 0xffffffff808680fe at kdb_backtrace+0x5e
 #1 0xffffffff80832cb7 at panic+0x187
 #2 0xffffffff80b185a0 at trap_fatal+0x290
 #3 0xffffffff80b188e9 at trap_pfault+0x1f9
 #4 0xffffffff80b18daf at trap+0x3df
 #5 0xffffffff80b0324f at calltrap+0x8
 #6 0xffffffff809f75a7 at udp6_bind+0xa7
 #7 0xffffffff808a152e at kern_bind+0xde
 #8 0xffffffff808a15a1 at sys_bind+0x41
 #9 0xffffffff80b17e90 at amd64_syscall+0x4e0
 #10 0xffffffff80b03537 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7
 Uptime: 9h41m13s
 Dumping 3411 out of 16088 
 MB:..1%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..61%..71%..81%..91%
 
 
 On 10/31/2012 01:35 PM, Tommy Sonne Alstrøm wrote:
 > Thanks for the answer.
 >
 > Please note, that I had no network shares mounted when the 2nd crash 
 > occurred.
 >
 > Sorry if I chose the wrong category.
 >
 > BR Tommy
 >
 > On 10/31/2012 01:31 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
 >> This looks like an smbfs/netsmb related bug.
 >>
 >> P.S. There was no reason to chose 'amd64' category.
 >