Is Gnome2 not supported on the amd64 ARCH?

[fbsdmail at dnswatch.com]

On Sun, January 2, 2011 10:56 pm, fbsdmail at dnswatch.com wrote:
>

> On Sun, January 2, 2011 10:29 am, 文鳥 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 06:42:27 -0800 (PST)
>> fbsdmail at dnswatch.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello again, and thanks for your response.
>>> I commented it out after responding to your response, and
>>> it happily built. I just figured I'd use the CPUTYPE?= option to gain
>>> better amd64 profiling, but apparently it's only _really_ available
>>> for the i386 CPU's. I say that because I've always used that option
>>> when building on those ARCH types, and never ran into a problem. Oh
>>> well, hopefully sometime son, it'll be better supported on the amd64 -
>>> fingers crossed. :)
>>>
>>> Thanks again for taking the time to respond.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Please take a look at /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
>> It clearly states that athlon-mp is for the Intel x86 arch _only_.

Ahem...
Straight from /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf:
# Currently the following CPU types are recognized:
#   Intel x86 architecture:
#       (AMD CPUs)	opteron athlon64 athlon-mp athlon-xp athlon-4
-----------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^
#			athlon-tbird athlon k8 k6-3 k6-2 k6 k5
#       (Intel CPUs)	core2 core nocona pentium4m pentium4 prescott
#			pentium3m pentium3 pentium-m pentium2
#			pentiumpro pentium-mmx pentium i486 i386
#       (Via CPUs)	c3 c3-2
#   Alpha/AXP architecture: ev67 ev6 pca56 ev56 ev5 ev45 ev4
#   AMD64 architecture: opteron, athlon64, nocona, prescott, core2
#   Intel ia64 architecture: itanium2, itanium

Sorry, couldn't resist. ;)

No offense intended.

>> Wikipedia tells us the same
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_mp#Athlon_XP.2FMP). Therefore I
>> assume, that (since you've got amd64 running), your CPU isn't really an
>> "athlon-mp", but rather one of the following (again from the make.conf
>> example): opteron, athlon64, nocona, prescott, core2
>>
>>
>>
>> PS: I personally use "native", since that gives me the same level of
>> optimization as choosing the correct CPU by hand would. Additionally,
>> you might consider compiling ports with gcc45, since the base cc doesn't
>>  support newer CPU features like e.g. SSE4.2.
>
> Right you are. :)
> As I stated to Luchesar, in my last reply, it's been awhile since
> I actually researched make(1) && make.conf(5). The last amd64 boxes
> I built using ths CPUTYPE?=athlon-mp were on 8-(PRE)RELEASE.
> In fact the only reason I chose athlon-mp is because one of the
> first ports I built echoed that in the config flags during the build. So
> without any research, I figured that to be (howeer mis- takenly) the
> correct choice. :)
>
> Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
>
>
> --Chris
>
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-amd64 at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> kern:
> FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-amd64 at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>


-- 
kern:
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64