kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD

[Ceri Davies]

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 09:54:53PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, 17:20-0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> 
> > Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: ceri
> > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer.
> > This is an interesting test case though.
> 
> I think better mark ULE bugs as suspended.  I have plans to take them
> over.

I don't intend to sweep them all.  I just didn't see a problem statement
in this PR, and figured that it was due to the fact that ULE was default
at the time the PR was raised.

Feel free to reopen it if you disagree.

Ceri
-- 
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/attachments/20061008/7a6af5e5/attachment.pgp