I need linuxolator testers with an amd64 machine (easy but time consuming)

[hideo]

John Baldwin (Wed 07/19/06 16:39):
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 16:18, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> (Wed, 19 Jul 2006 
> 22:13:08 +0200):
> > 
> > > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> (Wed, 19 Jul 2006 
> 22:09:03 +0200):
> > > 
> > > > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> (Wed, 19 Jul 2006 
> 20:31:59 +0200):
> > > > 
> > > > > Ugh... I try to get the port updated to it can be installed with the
> > > > > new default linux base port... in the mean time someone should dig out
> > > > > an old package and extract the program out of it...
> > > > 
> > > > Done. Until the package is build (because of a build time conflict with
> > > > the default linux base port you need to install the package if you have
> > > > the default linux base port installed), I have a package for -current
> > > > at http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/ for download.
> > > 
> > > Uhm... this is an i386 package... I change it to use the new
> > > IA32_BINARY_PACKAGE stuff... wait an hour after this mail and it should
> >               ^^^^^^^
> >               PORT
> > > be available.
> > 
> > I think I spoke too fast... can someone explain me please, if i386
> > packages can be installed on amd64? The IA32_BINARY_PORT stuff doesn't
> > deal with packages...
> > 
> > And can an i386 linux_kdump package work on amd64 and decode the amd64
> > ktrace.out?
> 
> Since amd64 can only run i386 Linux binaries for now the ktrace.out should be 
> processed by an i386 linux_kdump.

The output using the latest linux_kdump is all very similar to this for 
bash:

 35775 ktrace   RET   #0 -1 errno 100096 Unknown error: 100096
 linux_kdump: data too short

Zach