the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:29:02AM -0700, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> An older article I just happened across:
> 
> <http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/194/45/>
> 
> Personally think he's far off the mark, e.g.
> 
> "The AMD64 edition didn't work well on two systems. Since it has a long
> and inglorious history of severe stability problems that appear to have
> carried over into 6.0, I would strongly recommend using the i386
> edition of FreeBSD instead of the AMD64 edition."
> 
> Definitely not congruous with my experiences but then my amd64 systems
> are far from stressed:-)  But thought I'd post the link in case someone
> wanted to address in more detail.

You're right that it's old news, but the consensus seemed to be that
he's posting from some kind of weird parallel universe where things
work Differently :-)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/attachments/20060127/6c88f6ec/attachment.bin