amd64 optimized gcc?
Kövesdán Gábor
gabor.kovesdan at t-hosting.hu
Wed May 25 10:51:08 PDT 2005
Hello,
As for the optimization, I'm very interested how fast can be an actual
optimized system. The stock release doesn't optimizes too much, afaik it
uses -O. I have been experimenting for a while with building the whole
system with my custom cflags, and yesterday I succeeded. I managed to
build the whole system with
CFLAGS=-s -Os -march=athlon64
COPTFLAGS=-s -Os -march=athlon64
I might have used -O2 instead of -Os but not -O3 which made a
compilation error.
The -s is for srtipping the binaries and libs, because this is intended
to be used on a production system, where we use stable software
releases, thus we don't need debug symbols
And I ripped out the softwares I don't need with macros. (named,
sendmail, games, ...) Unfortunately I don't have a machine for testing
purposes but I would ty it. If I provide You such a disc would You try
it in the same way? I'm not sure it is a working a disc, but it should
be. I haven't read that anybody made such discs.
Cheers,
Gábor Kövesdán
Nicolas Blais wrote:
>I am developping a software that follows a random()-dependant algorithm which
>is extremely cpu intensif.
>I decided to run on different platforms to see how it performed based on cpu
>and os (in a way of benchmarking) and I'm surprised by the numbers:
>
>Reference times for benchmark (5e+07 run of the algorithm):
>
>(FreeBSD/i386) Venice (S939, 512K L2 cache) Athlon64 3000 overclocked @ 2655
>Mhz : 78.3072 s (638511 r/s)
> Note: Cool 'n' Quiet! Disabled in BIOS.
> Note: 1 G RAM
>
>(FreeBSD/amd64) Venice (S939, 512K L2 cache) Athlon64 3000 overclocked @ 2655
>Mhz : 71.2521 s (701732 r/s)
> Note: Cool 'n' Quiet! Disabled in BIOS.
> Note: 1 G RAM
>
>(Knoppix/i386) Clawhammer (S747, 1MB L2 cache) Athlon64 3200 @ 2000 Mhz :
>133.858 s (373325 r/s)
> Note: Compaq R3240CA Laptop, Cool 'n' Quiet! forced by BIOS.
> Note: 512 M RAM
>
>(FreeBSD/amd64) Clawhammer (S747, 1MB L2 cache) Athlon64 3200 @ 2000 Mhz :
>47.2754 s (1057630 r/s)
> Note: Compaq R3240CA Laptop, Cool 'n' Quiet! forced by BIOS.
> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.px_control=-1
> Note: 512 M RAM
>
>(FreeBSD/i386) Pentium II @ 233 Mhz : 538.136 s (92913.3 r/s)
> Note: 192 M RAM
>
>Not surprising is the Pentium II :). What is surprising is that amd64 FreeBSD
>seems to execute code faster than i386 FreeBSD, so I'm wondering if gcc
>(amd64) really optimizes code for the cpu. If it is, I would probably move my
>httpd server to amd64...
>
>Also, maybe less surprising is that Knoppix sucks running the algorithm for
>some reason and that L2 cache really is a big factor (my Laptop outperforms
>my heavily overclocked box).
>
>Any comments?
>
>
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list