Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64?
David Xu
davidxu at freebsd.org
Sat Jun 18 00:08:13 GMT 2005
Jarrod Martin wrote:
> Adriaan de Groot wrote:
>
>> On Friday 17 June 2005 10:18, David O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:49:28PM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Lots of motherboards have two RAID controllers on board. See, the VIA
>>>> KT800 chipset has one and some vendors add a second, like a
>>>> promise, for
>>>> added value. 4 SATA connectors on the motherboard, on two different
>>>> controllers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why do so many motherboard manufacturers do that? Is the SiI or
>>> Promise
>>> RAID controller ready better than the VIA one?
>>>
>>
> no... it isn't. you can read most of the motherboard reviews and
> learn that the performance increases are slim to none for the
> secondary SATA controller. in fact performance on the included SATA
> controller is normally better (but by a negligible amount).
>
Secondary SATA normally is connected by PCI which has limited bandwidth
and longer latency when comparing with chipsets built in SATA controller,
Don't know how well a PCI-e based SATA controller will perform.
David Xu
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list