Benchmarks: AMD64 vs i386 on Dual 246 Opteron
Martin Cracauer
cracauer at cons.org
Fri Jul 29 12:38:47 GMT 2005
ray at redshift.com wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700:
> At 07:35 PM 7/28/2005 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> | > While this sounded like a long shot, I loaded FreeBSD 5.4 i386 on the machine
> | > and after applying the exact same configuration to the OS, Apache, PHP and
> | > MySQL, re-ran the benchmarks. Much to my surprise, just changing the OS
> from 64
> | > bit to 32 bit caused the machine to double in speed. The results are attached
> | > in an Excel spreadsheet. So the exact same machine, running the identical
> | > configuration, performed roughly twice as fast when running FreeBSD 5.4 i386 vs
> | > FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64. Something about this seems so wrong to me :-)
> |
> | I'm sorry but I cannot support these findings. I don't have
> | cut'n'paste numbers handy, but generally 64 bits speed up things quite
> | a bit for me. I have seen slowdown in 64 bit mode in e.g. bzip2 but
> | generally there is a speedup.
>
> On the AMD64, I am pretty sure that I did *not* include the following lines like
> I normally do on the i386:
>
> options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel
> device apic # I/O APIC
I occurse to me that not using one of the two CPUs might have
something to do with a performance drop of approximately 50% :-)
Martin
--
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer at cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
No warranty. This email is probably produced by one of my cats
stepping on the keys. No, I don't have an infinite number of cats.
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list