PC Card subpart to R3000 thread
Coleman Kane
zombyfork at gmail.com
Fri Feb 18 11:31:57 PST 2005
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:49:53 -0500, Jung-uk Kim <jkim at niksun.com> wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 12:23 pm, Warner Losh wrote:
> > # I'll note that I really like to be cc'd on changes that impact
> > the # pccard part of the system :-)
> >
> > : Yeah the recipient of the fix just emailed me about this, I am
> > : guessing that the #if 0 is the uncommitable part. Is there any
> > : way that this can be done by the kernel (the PCI reg write, that
> > : is)? Is there any reason that it can't be done there?
> >
> > I'd be extremely reluctant to commit the #if 0 part of the fix.
> > The problem is that we don't quite do bus numbering/renumbering
> > correctly for pci busses in general. There's some kludges in
> > cardbus bridge to cope with this, but I don't like them much at
> > all.
> >
> > So, yes, something can be done about this in the kernel, but that
> > something is rather more complicated than this overly simplistic
> > kludge.
>
> Exactly. :-)
Oh, cool. I was not aware of this numbering issue.
>
> > --- src/sys/dev/pci/pci_pci.c.orig Thu Jul 1 03:46:28 2004
> > +++ src/sys/dev/pci/pci_pci.c Sat Jan 22 01:21:50 2005
> > @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@
> > start = sc->iobase;
> > if (end > sc->iolimit)
> > end = sc->iolimit;
> > + if (start <= end)
> > + ok = 1;
> >
> >
> > This looks OK to me. At first I thought it was crazy and
> > unnecessary to set this, but I think it might be OK. It does seem
> > very odd that we've not seen this before now. Oh, wait, the <=
> > should be <. == would imply that the range is 0.
>
> Oops, my bad.
>
> Thanks for committing this!
>
> Jung-uk Kim
>
> > Warner
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-amd64 at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list