Recommendations?
O. Hartmann
ohartman at mail.uni-mainz.de
Sat Apr 16 06:10:54 PDT 2005
Florent Thoumie schrieb:
>Le Saturday 16 April 2005 à 13:43 +0200, Roman Neuhauser a écrit :
>
>
>># flz at xbsd.org / 2005-04-16 00:23:43 +0200:
>>
>>
>>>Le Friday 15 April 2005 ? 14:16 -0700, David O'Brien a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:09:04PM -0700, Astrodog wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 4/14/05, David O'Brien <obrien at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 03:14:45PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Jung-uk Kim <jkim at niksun.com> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Stay away from nForce chipsets.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please stop spreading this little piece of disinformation. nForce3
>>>>>>>motherboards such as the Asus SK8N should work fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>DES stop spreading FUD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>I think the point to be made here, is that there are SOME specific
>>>>>nforce based boards, that work great,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>There are? Which?? The SK8N that DES will respond to my email is
>>>>actually high on the "bizzare issues" list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I have an Asus A8N-SLI (nforce4) Motherboard based box running
>>> 5-STABLE for some time now. Issues are :
>>> x ACPI (quite common),
>>> x Sound (not much a problem since I have an Emu10K1 based sound
>>> card which is far better),
>>> x Network (sk0 works fine, but not should-be-nv0),
>>> x USB (no clue, I'm not using it ATM but firewire works).
>>>
>>> The system is totally usable,
>>>
>>>
>> You have listed things that are *not* usable, which means the board
>> is not *totally* usable. Please think a bit about what you post. :)
>>
>> So, what *does* work on the board? PS/2 mouse / keyboard, ATA,
>> PCI-E graphics, and that's it?
>>
>>
>
> The only thing that is a bit annoying is sound (which has been
> reported as working, read the other posts). BTW, integrated
> sound chipset are usually crap.
>
>
Indeed, and this 32-Bit hardware AC97 is further crap in a 64Bit system
and we pay
for this 'beeing lost in furure when we have more than 4GB RAM' and must
doing
nasty things like memory remapping ...
> ACPI/APIC isn't really necessary (I wasn't using it since DES
> told it was working with NO_MIXED_MODE commented). The MB has
> two integrated networking chipsets, and people usually don't
> care about one not working. And I said I was clueless about USB
> because I wasn't using it.
>
> That makes the box usuable (remove "totally" if it can make you
> happier).
>
> My point is that a page with FreeBSD/amd64 status on different
> MBs would be much more useful than "Plz stay away from nvidia,
> this is crap".
>
>
I aggree, too.
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list