Patch to optimize "bare" critical sections
John Baldwin
jhb at FreeBSD.org
Tue Nov 23 13:36:46 PST 2004
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 03:00 pm, John Baldwin wrote:
> Basically, I have a patch to divorce the interrupt disable/deferring to
> only happen inside of spinlocks using a new spinlock_enter/exit() API
> (where a spinlock_enter/exit includes a critical section as well) but that
> plain critical sections won't have to do such a thing. I've tested it on
> i386, alpha, and sparc64 already, and it has also been tested on arm. I'm
> unable to get a cross-built powerpc kernel to link (linker dies with a
> signal 6), but the compile did finish. I have cross-compiled ia64 and
> amd64
> successfully, but have not run tested due to ENOHARDWARE. So, I would
> appreciate it if a few folks could try the patch out on ppc, ia64, and
> amd64 to make sure it works ok. Thanks.
>
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/spinlock.patch
*cough* Ahem, http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/spinlock.patch
Sorry about that.
--
John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list