ATA (Re: AMD64 support in 5.x versions)
James Van Artsdalen
james at jrv.org
Wed Jan 14 04:24:49 PST 2004
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:04 +0100
> From: Bill Squire <billsf at curacao.n2it.nl>
> I've got several large SCSI disks spinning and have since purchased an
> ordinary ATA-133 IDE and a SATA drive.
SCSI vs. ATA can be a religious argument.
On the practical side if you have more than 4 GB of RAM I don't know
of any cost-effective solution that can address memory above 4 GB
directly, without using bounce-buffers. I understand that some
Adaptec SCSI host adapters can do this (PCI "dual address cycle" or a
full 64-bit bus if available) without resorting to exotic RAID
controllers.
Highpoint sells an RR-1820 PCI-X (64-bit 133 MHz) serial ATA controller
but I cannot get them to send me any technical documentation and
cannot get it to work with Windows with the supplied drivers. Silicon
Image has a 3124 chip which is PCI-X and ought to be able to directly
address more than 4 GB of RAM but I don't know of any card that uses
this yet.
I have 8 GB of RAM and use a HighPoint 1542 sATA controller, and am no
doubt exercising the bounce buffers extensively. This seems entirely
stable but for performance I wouldn't want to do it with a disk-bound
system in a production environment.
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list