ports/emulators/linux_base on amd64
Sean McNeil
sean at mcneil.com
Tue Dec 14 14:13:04 PST 2004
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 23:54 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:34:06AM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> [...]
> > rpm scripts should also be fixed. It seems like a bug in the rpm port
> > that no one has addressed.
> >
> rpm port is not guilty -- running the postinstall script
> manually on amd64 returns 1, but on i386 it returns 0:
>
> Script started on Tue Dec 14 23:10:31 2004
> hammer# /compat/linux/bin/sh
> sh-2.04# uname -srm
> Linux 2.4.2 amd64
> sh-2.04# /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade
> sh-2.04# echo $?
> 1
> Script done on Tue Dec 14 23:10:53 2004
Yes, I just got to this point. Thanks for the confirmation. I'm trying
to find sources to glibc_post_upgrade to take a look.
Cheers,
Sean
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/attachments/20041214/6cea2e5c/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-amd64
mailing list