[PATCH] ACPI CMOS region support rev. 6

Moore, Robert robert.moore at intel.com
Fri Jun 26 02:33:51 UTC 2015


How do you handle the fact that there are three different CMOS/RTC devices defined in the ACPI specification? (There are three different _HIDs).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-acpi at freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> acpi at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Jenkins
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 6:16 PM
> To: Ian Smith; Warner Losh
> Cc: freebsd-acpi at freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI CMOS region support rev. 6
> 
> ...and of course I forget the attachment...
> 
> On 06/25/15 21:14, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
> > Sooo here's the new and improved rev. 6, "new and improved" because it
> > increases the diff line count by 332%.
> >> [ajenkins at ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/src]$ wc -l atrtc_c_rev5.diff
> >> atrtc_rev6.diff
> >>      220 atrtc_c_rev5.diff
> >>      731 atrtc_rev6.diff
> > This is to satisfy the request to split the atrtc.c driver into a "core"
> > part and "bus" parts:
> >> Looking at patch 5:
> >>
> >> You need to rework this so there's an atrtc_acpi.c. Put all the ACPI
> attachment in there. You should also split off the little bit that's ISA-
> specific into atrtc_isa. Once you do that, we can talk.
> >>
> >> Warner
> > I actually finished this patch a couple months ago and have been
> > running it on my laptop, I just don't see the point...maybe Warner
> > could elaborate on the rationale for his request?  At the very least,
> > this should be two commits - the functional change and the
> > refactorization request.
> >
> > I may have also added Ian's request for verbosity tweaks, but it's
> > been a while... I don't see any CMOS logging noise FWIW.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anthony
> >
> >



More information about the freebsd-acpi mailing list