Fwd: Activating Suspend/Resume on FreeBSD 10.1
Kevin Oberman
rkoberman at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 03:49:50 UTC 2015
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Friday, January 30, 2015 12:37:10 pm Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > My experience is the opposite. With KMS I could run with VESA and
> without
> > it I needed to pull VESA from my kernel.
> >
> > As of today I am running fine with KMS, i915, and vt(4) with a standard
> > GENERIC 10-STABLE kernel. I was running KMS and vt(4) well before they
> were
> > MFCed, so I don't remember when I stopped adding "nooptions VESA", but I
> > definitely used to need it to make suspect/resume work and don't any
> longer.
> >
> > In any case, trying kernel without VESA is a good idea.
>
> FYI, VESA only applies to sc(4). It is ignored for vt(4). That is why it
> "works" with vt(4).
>
> --
> John Baldwin
>
I suspected that was the case, but did not recall for sure. Thanks for the
confirmation, though it does not help with the problem reported.
--
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
More information about the freebsd-acpi
mailing list