AMT Activation ACPI warnings

Moore, Robert robert.moore at intel.com
Tue Aug 20 19:43:21 UTC 2013


It appears to be a vendor thing. However, still in direct violation of the ACPI spec.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:33 PM
> To: Moore, Robert
> Cc: freebsd-acpi at freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings
> 
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:20 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > We have seen at least one video vendor that uses a Buffer object
> > instead of the ACPI-required package object as the 4th _DSM argument.
> >
> >
> 
> The T520 has a Nvidia thingy in it.  Is this something we need to deal
> with in the BSD ACPI implementation or is this a vendor thing?
> 
> Sean


More information about the freebsd-acpi mailing list