Worked in RELENG_5, fails in RELENG_6

[Nate Lawson]

John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 05:26 pm, Moore, Robert wrote:
> 
>>FACS does not replace FADT. FACS is an ACPI 1.0 table as well.
> 
> 
> Ok, nevermind then, I misread things in the brief browsing I did of 
> CHANGES.txt in the ACPICA distribution.  Do you have any ideas why an older 
> version of ACPICA would accept his FACS, but the more recent versions are now 
> choking on it?  Did the in-kernel version not verify checksums on FACS until 
> recently?  It seems that acpidump has always reported that the table is 
> corrupt, even with the older ACPICA distribution.

RELENG_5 and 6 are the same versions of ACPICA.  Only 7-current has the 
newest dist.

-- 
Nate